Building Handbrake on CentOS started off painlessly enough. I just followed the instructions here. But then I ran into this compilation error:
set -e; cd ./contrib/libvorbis/aotuv-b6.03_20110424/; rm -fr aclocal.m4 autom4te.cache configure; autoreconf -I m4 -fiv; CC=/usr/bin/gcc CFLAGS="" CXX=/usr/bin/g++ CXXFLAGS="" CPPFLAGS="" LDFLAGS="" PKG_CONFIG_PATH="/home/ben/util/src/HandBrake-0.9.6/build/contrib/lib/pkgconfig" ./configure --prefix=/home/ben/util/src/HandBrake-0.9.6/build/contrib/ --disable-dependency-tracking --disable-shared --enable-static --with-ogg=/home/ben/util/src/HandBrake-0.9.6/build/contrib/ HAVE_PKG_CONFIG="no" autoreconf: Entering directory `.' autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Gettext autoreconf: running: aclocal --force autoreconf: configure.ac: tracing autoreconf: running: libtoolize --copy --force libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in `.'. libtoolize: copying file `./ltmain.sh' libtoolize: Consider adding `AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4])' to configure.ac and libtoolize: rerunning libtoolize, to keep the correct libtool macros in-tree. libtoolize: Consider adding `-I m4' to ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in Makefile.am. autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf --include=m4 --force configure.ac:215: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_ADD_CFLAGS If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 make: *** [contrib/libvorbis/.stamp.configure] Error 1
A Google and Forum search turned up no reports of anyone else with this issue. Yet, even the latest version of the source code from SVN turned up the same issue.
The fix turned out to be as follows. I edited the file:
./contrib/libvorbis/module.defs
and changed:
LIBVORBIS.CONFIGURE.bootstrap = rm -fr aclocal.m4 autom4te.cache configure; autoreconf -I m4 -fiv;
to:
LIBVORBIS.CONFIGURE.bootstrap = rm -fr aclocal.m4 autom4te.cache configure; sh autogen.sh;
(and yes, that trailing ';' is necessary)
Not sure why I'm the only one running into this. But, regardless, here's a fix.
This helped me so thanks I now have Handbrake0.9.6
ReplyDeleterunning on centos 6. Once I made change you outlined above I received an ogg not found error This was resolved by downloading and compiling libogg-1.3.0
so nice one!
Wow. I've been banging my head against the wall for months trying to solve this. Thanks. If it makes you feel any better you're not the only one having this problem.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the solution! Worked like a charm, and handbrake is compiled now :)
ReplyDeleteThanks - glad to help!
ReplyDeleteHALLA-FREAKIN-LOU-YUH!!!! Thank you so much for the fix. I had overlooked the OTHER contrib directory and would have never figured this one out on my own. I got a few more errors due to missing *-devel rpms but success would not be denied! Why this problem doesn't seem to be more widespread is interesting.
ReplyDeleteHere's another thank you! I've been wrestling with this on Oracle Linux 6.3 for the past week. Now I have my handbrake back - hurrah!
ReplyDeleteThanks so much for sharing this tip, you're saving us all a heck of a lot of time!
ReplyDeleteYou made my day! Beer on me. :)
ReplyDeletethanks!
ReplyDeleteThis problem is still there on CentOS 6.4 (updated from 6.3) and HandBrake 0.9.8 as of Mar 29th, 2013. (Your blog doesn't show dates on comments, only times. You might want to fix that. :))
ReplyDeleteI also needed to install the following additional packages:
libnotify-devel-0.5.0-1.el6.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-base-devel-0.10.29-2.el6.x86_64
gstreamer-devel-0.10.29-1.el6.x86_64
libgudev1-devel-147-2.46.el6.x86_64
webkitgtk-devel-1.2.6-2.el6_0.x86_64
gtk2-devel-2.18.9-12.el6.x86_64
glib2-devel-2.22.5-7.el6.x86_64
bzip2-devel-1.0.5-7.el6_0.x86_64
libogg-devel-1.1.4-2.1.el6.x86_64
fribidi-devel-0.19.2-2.el6.x86_64
epel-release-6-8.noarch
centos-release-cr-6-0.el6.centos.x86_64
I think I got all of the above right; the list is based on "rpm -qa --last". There are many others due to dependencies, but they're not listed.
These fixes should be part of HB methinks. I already have a couple of bug reports into them (for OSX) so another one in this regard will be easy.
Thanks for your help!
Thx man... perfect!
ReplyDeletehaha,0.9.9 is all right.
ReplyDelete